Comparison between the Sony A6300 and the Sony A7 II
Public Group
active 2 months ago
Group Organizers
- Organized by
-
-
Furthermore, the camera is capable of recording in the Super 35mm format with complete pixel readout and without the need of pixel binning. It makes advantage of the sensor’s 20MP resolution, which is equivalent to 6K resolution before downsampling to 4K size. In Full HD, the camera can record at a frame rate of up to 120 frames per second, allowing for smoother slow motion video. The A7 II is equipped with a 3624 sensor. The A7 II has the same resolution as the A7, but it features a bigger sensor (35mm format, also referred to as full-frame). It is the same sensor that was used in the original Sony A7, with a few enhancements to reduce the annoyance of ghost cyan flares in low light.
I believe that an exposure compensation dial is really necessary these days since it substantially speeds up processing and the current value is constantly displayed on the dial. Despite the fact that the A7 II has a bigger sensor, both cameras have a resolution of 24 megapixels, making them almost identical. The Sony a6300 is the company’s latest flagship APS-C camera and it is available now. It was announced only a few days ago, and it provides significant enhancements to the autofocus system as well as video capability, among other features. Likewise, the pricing is reasonable, however it is somewhat more costly than its predecessor, the a6000.
When the a7iii is launched, it is not unrealistic to anticipate it to come as part of a package offer. After years of attempting to work around the issue, Fuji has truly shot itself in the foot with this one, and it has really gotten under my skin. I had the Fuji X-T2 and really loved it; it is a joy to use and the lenses are just fantastic. I would recommend it to everyone. Mentally, we’re in the same situation, despite the fact that I’ve had my feet in the FE system since its inception and have mostly avoided the APS-C portion of the system in the past.
The FE seems to be a respectable performance, and it is half the price of the FE while also being suitable on full frame. According to what I’ve read, the a7II is less noisy at higher ISOs, but the low-light focus is not as excellent as the a6500, so I’m either still on the fence or waiting to see what happens. It is excellent for landscape photography, but when a subject begins to move, it becomes a roulette game. For this price, I expect something that is both beautiful in landscape and functional in moving portrait.
When you make a purchase after clicking on one of the affiliate links on this site, APOTELYT.com may get a commission. Neither the affiliate payment nor the amount that you are charged by the merchant will be affected by this payment. The A6300 is available in two distinct color options, but the A7 II is only available in one color: black. In terms of design, the a6300’s electronic viewfinder is positioned on the left side of the camera, but the A7 II has an SLR-like design with the EVF located in the center of the camera, which simulates a pentaprism. Sony is well-known for its proclivity to produce numerous camera bodies in a short amount of time, which may frequently cause confusion in the eyes of prospective customers when deciding which one to buy.
The camera also has a new option dubbed High-density tracking AF, which activates a huge number of points surrounding a subject in order to track it more accurately. Another new feature is the ability to employ autofocus while also activating the focus magnifier. The absence of a specific exposure compensation slider is particularly inconvenient for the sort of photography that I do.
When compared to competing full frame systems, the Sony full frame system is really rather reasonable in price. We encourage you to email us this article using our feedback form if you feel there are any inaccurate tags. It is somewhat shorter than the A7, yet it is around the same thickness as the A7. I’d been coveting these cameras for a while now, and I was delighted to see that they were all in stock at the shop today.
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the technical specifications of the two cameras, which should help you quickly assess their differences and similarities. Because of the electronic shutter on the a6300, it is possible to shoot in a quiet mode. It is accessible even while shooting in continuous mode at up to 3 frames per second with AF/AE tracking. In terms of resolution, the Sony a6300 is the first APS-C camera from the company to be capable of capturing 4K video.
The change between the two versions is not immediately noticeable, and it can only make a difference in certain scenarios. Having the uncompressed option, on the other hand, might be beneficial if you intend to put a lot of strain on the RAW file during post-production. Another consideration is weight, which is particularly significant when choosing a camera that you will be carrying about with you all day. The Sony A6300 is substantially lighter than the Sony A7 II, which may prove to be a considerable benefit when traveling long distances on foot.
The essential physical specifications of the two cameras, as well as a larger range of comparable cameras, are summarized in the table below. To show and compare another camera pair, you may use the CAM-parator app, which allows you to choose your camera combination from among a vast number of available possibilities. If you place a high value on portability and low weight, the Sony A6300 is an excellent choice. The following is a side-by-side comparison of the Sony A6300 and Sony A7 II’s rear views. When it comes to APSC bodies (e.g. A6xxx), has anybody compared the performance of the FE28F2 with the SEL24F18Z?
The one quibble I have with your evaluation is that, although Sony has not been launching new APS-C lenses, other manufacturers have done so in recent months. A6000 cameras can take use of my Rokinon 12mm f2 lens, which performs just as well as my Voigtlander 15mm Super Heliar III on A7 bodies; and my Sigma 19mm f2.8 Art is very similar to my Zony FE 35mm f2.8 lens, which performs just as well on my A7 series cameras. I’m certain that the Nikkor mm f2.8 AF ED lens that I’ve modified for the TechArt – and that is functioning well there – would perform admirably on an A6500. Even with the older line-up of lenses available for APSC Sony cameras, you have a good selection to choose from, and none of them come with the exorbitant price tag associated with full-frame lenses. Since 2014, I’ve had my feet firmly planted in the Sony APS-C universe, and I just acquired an A6500, mostly for the reasons you mentioned.
Bluetooth – GPS was a popular feature on Sony A-mount cameras a few years ago, however it was discontinued with the release of the A77. With the use of a cell phone, the A6500 is capable of geotagging images. The camera is capable of transmitting the GPS location as well as the accurate date of the mobile device, and it does so via the use of Bluetooth. That worked well, however the Playmemories app consistently reported that the camera was missing even while my camera was within reach.
